Analysis Underscores Need for Continued Alternative Fuel Research
WASHINGTON, D.C. – February 26, 2025 – The Association of American Railroads (AAR) today released a new independent analysis highlighting the overwhelming financial, operational, and infrastructure challenges of transitioning the U.S. freight rail network to overhead catenary electrification. The study estimates the cost of electrifying the nation’s 139,000-mile freight rail network at $1.1 trillion—equivalent to 47 years of combined net income from all six Class I freight railroads. Additionally, the study outlines significant energy demands, reliability concerns, and other operational challenges that render catenary electrification infeasible for U.S. freight operations.
“Railroads continue to identify and invest in technologies that will make the industry more sustainable and resilient,” said Senior Vice President of Safety and Operations Michael Rush. “Today, railroads can move a single ton of freight nearly 500 miles on a single gallon of fuel, but we are striving for further improvements. This study puts to bed any notions that catenary is a viable solution. Now is the time to focus investments and attention on alternatives that can truly work for freight rail.”
Key Challenges of Catenary Electrification:
- Reliability Risks: Beyond its costs, catenary systems could also impact reliability by creating a single point of failure that could be susceptible to extreme weather events or hazards like falling trees. Interruptions to rail service could have significant consequences for the U.S. and global supply chain.
- Strain on the Energy Grid: Powering freight rail through catenary electrification would require an additional 40–50 TWh of electricity—equivalent to the output of six new nuclear power plants, 11 million new solar panels, or 1,800 utility-scale wind turbines. This demand far exceeds the grid’s current capabilities and would require extensive infrastructure expansion.
- Regulatory and Safety Hurdles: Securing the federal and state permits necessary for a project of this scale would take many years, possibly decades, diverting time and resources from more practical solutions. Additionally, catenary electrification introduces new safety risks, including potential hazards from high-voltage wires, as well as increased operational costs for system maintenance.
Focus on Sustainable Alternatives
The rail industry continues to pilot emerging technologies such as battery-electric and hydrogen fuel-cell locomotives that can potentially reduce greenhouse gas emissions and criteria pollutants. Despite billions in investments and an industry-wide push to unlock an alternative solution, a scalable zero-emissions path has not yet emerged.
In the meantime, railroads are leveraging fuel optimization software and anti-idling technology, testing biodiesel and renewable diesel, and exploring fuel additives to lower emissions. Additionally, railroads are upgrading locomotives to higher emission-reduction tiers when practical to help advance sustainability through using today’s available solutions.
“Railroads are actively working to develop sustainable solutions that balance environmental benefits with the operational demands and practical realities of freight transportation,” added Rush. “This study reinforces the imperative of channeling investments into technologies that have the potential to deliver tangible benefits – without the insurmountable challenges posed by catenary electrification.”
###